• redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As should europe. Clearly you can’t trust the USA anymore. What is the long-term prospect for spare parts?

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “No u” come on with the childish shit. Yes we could trust Europe you dumb dumb. America literally wouldn’t exist without French support but you wanna be a contrarian so bad you just ignore everything and type out this moronic dribble

        • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can even look into much closer history - look at the participants of Enduring Freedom. Nice to see how respected the life’s of our citizens, who died in Afghanistan or elsewhere, are to people like that.

      • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Kindly - shut up. All those countries you don’t trust followed America into Afghanistan, many into other wars. All lost citizens in support of American and joint interests, we did our part, as allies should. Guess we now know who is the real untrustworthy partner, and I doubt any of us will forget the betrayal anytime soon.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won’t be on Trump’s radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Goddamn right we should. Take the French up on the offer to build the Rafale here. Or the Swedes. And get a few demo units for short term.

    Fuck 'em on any cancellation fees too. Consider it partial compensation for the ridiculous trade war.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      None of those airplanes even have similar capabilities. Why do you think the entirety of Europe has ordered so many F-35.

      The only alternative is to wait 15+(realistically 20+) years for a 6gen plane from Europe. And with the alliance dying, who knows how much longer it will take now

      Rafale and Gripen are more expensive and in many ways, less good. There is a reason why noone is buying them, or even if they did, they still want to buy more F-35.

      • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        F35 is far more expensive to operate, so you end up paying more over the lifetime if you actually use it.

        Of course the other aircraft don’t have a bunch of fancy features of the F35, but maybe we don’t need them, particularly in light of the US hostility and unpredictability. And the benefit of building our own is a factor as well.

        As I undertand it, the F35 has only about 55% readiness and suffers SW problems as well.

        The US is not the only game in town, and we need to be clear about that.

      • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The gripen is more agile than the f35 and capable of austere landings. Arguably more important traits than the ability to carry American nukes.

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          Being agile is kinda irrelevant if one can detect, lock and launch missiles tens of kilometers before the other plane can even detect it. Real life is not Top Gun. This is why everyone is buying the F-35.

          There is a reason why China is spending billions designing and making stealth fighters, bombers and drones.

          Agility isnt useless but it is highly overrated mostly by Russia, because they cant afford to produce(in relevant quantities) a stealth plane.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why do you think the entirety of Europe has ordered so many F-35.

        The reason for Germany is that other aircraft, by choice, have not been certified for use with US nuclear weapons.

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Nuke capability is irrelevant for most countries(rafale has a nuke capable variant, though only for French nukes). Take a look at its operators

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_operators

          Everyone who can get it(allied to the US), has already ordered it or will soon. The only exceptions are Sweden and France, who wanted to maintain some degree of strategic independence and not lose their jet fighter building capability. And Spain, though Spain was also kinda thinking of getting F-35 too(before Trump).

          Canada was like Sweden and France, they could manufacture capable planes. But this is immensely expensive. Thats why Canada(and most countries) stopped doing it. This is why the F-35 is cheap, economies of scale, and why countries are willing to wait 5+ years to get it(while rafale and Gripen are basically readily available).

          Europe wanted to coast through 5gen planes by using the F-35 while skipping ahead and developing, 2 completely different apparently, 6gen planes by 2040ish.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

    Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

  • yannic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they’ll get two in a row?

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    19 hours ago

    American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

  • opi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35’s is fishy - not that that’s happening, of course.

    Canada’s interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That’ll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

      Here’s the bad news. It’s not. Sure, we’re good at peacekeeping, and we deploy to support (militarily) our allies. But we’re using US gear and we’re woefully underfunded because war budget has been declared a waste by even the parties who strut and posture about a strong military. We only needed to fulfill our NATO obligations, for decades, and even that has been a struggle we haven’t won consistently with the low budget.

      And while we’re skilled enough and gung-ho, and our 1st Pioneers are about the most scary bunch of lumberjack commandos you’ll ever see, there’s just so few of them, and again their gear has been called old and out of repair by every administration campaigning because the last one never did a thing about it.

      We’re gonna need a lot of funding and training and gear to make up the shortfall in people and powpow toys, and that’s a slice of gov pork that Milhouse is gonna latch onto knowing that he doesn’t need an army once he gives the country over. Justin doesn’t want to spend that, but he - and please God let it be Mark next - is really gonna have to.

      But how do we sell it to the “hair guy bad” flatlanders steeped in 12 years of hating Justin for not being a pseudo-aristocratic milquetoast conservative?

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    20 hours ago

    With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

      I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we’re never getting them, though.

      • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This would be amazing for us to bring back military building here in Canada!!

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

      • barbarossa@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          If I had hair, I definitely would have been pulling it out at the time. It’s not like this situation came out of nowhere, but normalcy bias won the day.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Nah, y’all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

  • Franklin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    With a potential for an american invasion on the table, I wouldn’t want to cancel that deal without another similar plane deal lined up

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      20 hours ago

      While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada, I don’t imagine the F35 would be much help in that situation. I am sure there are remote access capabilities to cease their operation, at the very least.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada

        Until a few weeks ago I did not believe the US would impose tariffs on Canada or call it the “51st state,” so…

        • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The tariff go around happened last time, which is how we ended up with the NAFTA replacement. The “51st state” nonsense was projected previously, which is more about his ego and his belief that he has a lot of support in Canada.

          Edit: I suppose I should expect reality to be offensive to people at this point, yet I’m still surprised. That’s my fault. Continue living in fantasy land, ya’ll, and I won’t interfere with the truth again.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You have to enter a password to start up the F35. That password changes every day and USA needs to give these passwords. Locking a country out of the plane is as simple as stop sending the new passwords.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Hmm, opinions on the internet on if that’s true are mixed at best. It’s a level of control I’d be shocked anyone would accept. Someone on Quora is saying most countries weren’t even happy Lockheed Martin manages the supply chain and maintenance software.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      the potential for an invasion is precisely the reason you don’t want the f-35 around. that warbird is the most technologically dependent device ever crafted for warfare. it is deeply vulnerable to an adversary with the knowledge simply bricking it remotely and you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think the us military wouldn’t brick all of them. the better plan is to train with prior gen jets and asymmetric combat using drones.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Don’t forget the Gripen. There’s a great offer for domestic production still on the table, and it’s the asymmetric stall-an-invasion fighter.

      • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Put the funds from that cancellation toward a contract with Ukraine for advanced drone technology and the capacity to manufacture it domestically.

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If they were serious about invasions they wouldn’t deliver. We’re better off with Gripens IMO but she’s an even more expensive option.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t think an invasion could realistically happen. 1. Need congress to authorize a war that would impact U.S. soil and 2. need the military which isn’t under trumps thumb

      But making sure they have another deal is smart, probably delay the f-35, and get maybe the euro fighter or so. Solid planes and itd be horrible for U.S. to lose a military contract in NA to an EU. Get the military industrial conplex pissed at trump.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There’s a hell of a lot of “Congress has to authorize” that’s being blatantly ignored right now.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the President has a 30 day authority to use the military anywhere in the world. After 30 days he needs congressional authority. He can get a second 30 days while that’s going on and if Congress says no then he has to remove all troops within a final 30 day period.

        If Congress never says anything then he effectively has a blank check.

        Your best bet would actually be to run TV Ads trying to get the military to refuse the order. I think a large percentage actually would. I also think he’s going to invade Mexico first and if he does invade Canada he’ll do it like the Russians did Ukraine. (They told their troops it was a training mission and then only told them at the border that it was real)