Greene and Boebert have been going at it for nearly a year now. But Greene’s latest move is straight out of the high school cafeteria playbook.
  • Cypher@aussie.zone
    139·
    1 year ago

    MTG is known for her extra-marital affairs which got her divorced.

    It’s literally always projection with these losers.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        45·
        1 year ago

        Shes rich. Handed some construction buisness by her parents/grandparents. Apprently also owned the gym where most of the people she was fucking worked out.

        So like most shitty people : money.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
          232·
          1 year ago

          Don’t put your dick in crazy.

          Imagine having to make child support payment to her? Imagine having tovhave co-parenting conversations and kid swaps and stuff.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              4·
              1 year ago

              Not wrong. The crazy chick I dated in college was so much better in bed then the normal ones I went with since then. It honestly kind of ruined my expectations…

              • i_simp_4_tedcruz@lemmy.world
                22·
                1 year ago

                Ok, so here’s what happened, buddy. Crazy usually means reduced inhibitions. Reduced inhibitions= good in bed because you’re not overthinking, you’re just doing what feels awesome.

                Then you go out with a girl that’s not batshit insane and doesn’t go from 0-100 with everyone they bang, right away. You’re disappointed. Why does it feel like this normal girl isn’t obsessed with my body immediately? Why is she holding back? It can’t be you, so you attribute it to her being bad in bed rather than the obvious answer that she’s learning you and isn’t completely comfortable yet.

                That kind of stuff comes with time. Unless you’re batshit insane.

                Tldr: you rushed it with the “normal girls” and you could probably spend some more time growing close to them before declaring them inferior in bed.

                • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                  21·
                  1 year ago

                  I understand the problem. It doesn’t change the fact that the girl that doesn’t require a ton of effort to get to open up is objectively better in bed. Also I was with some of them that came afterwards for quite a while and things didn’t improve all that much. If anything it got worse after the honeymoon phase was over.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    831·
    1 year ago

    I hate both of these cunts, but what’s wrong with having bunches of sex? It’s not like Boebert is married.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.worldEnglish
      331·
      1 year ago

      Nothing wrong with it but maybe she shouldn’t have joined a club where the members have a pathological hatred of women.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      7·
      1 year ago

      You forget the modern Christian popular doctorine is no sex before marriage (though in practice this is only really expected to be binding of women because men being horny is just considered “natural”) and sex between only the married people afterwards.

      Problem with tying your political identity to a base that assumes misogyny as it’s religious dogma as their guiding principle is if you subscribe to it for reasons outside of religion you are still gunna get tarred by that brush.

  • shalafi@lemmy.worldEnglish
    66·
    1 year ago

    TWO trailer park girls go round the outside,

    round the outside,

    round the outside…

    Waiting for one of them to challenge the other, “Cash me ousside, howbow dah?”

    • Tolookah
      28·
      1 year ago

      It’s a new mechanic, trash a whore card puts it on the bottom of your discard pile, but if there are enough non-whore creatures above it in your discard, it gets resummoned, tapped.

  • yemmly@lemmy.world
    34·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure she meant it in a collegial sense, as in “peer” or “fellow traveler”.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    31·
    1 year ago

    Lmao, she also called her a “bitch/ little bitch” for “copying” her articles of impeachment. Boebert defended herself by saying she never read it, which is also hilarious, because she voted on it.

    "According to two sources that saw the exchange and a third familiar with the matter, the back and forth began when Boebert approached Greene—then seated in the chamber—and confronted her over “statements you made about me publicly.” All three of the sources said Greene called Boebert a “bitch.” One of the sources said Greene called her “a little bitch.”

    According to two of the sources, Greene then stood up and alleged that Boebert “copied my articles of impeachment,” to which the Colorado lawmaker fired back that she hadn’t even read Greene’s resolution."

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-calls-boebert-a-little-bitch-on-the-house-floor

    I would PAY to have good c-span footage of that.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      23·
      1 year ago

      Boebert defended herself by saying never read it, which is also hilarious, because she voted on it.

      This is actually believable.

  • Additional_Prune@lemmy.world
    30·
    1 year ago

    Hateful people sometimes get tired of hating scapegoats and take some time to hate each other. It’s like high school mean girls picking one of their own off from the herd.

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      163·
      1 year ago

      The pot. The origin of the saying is a cast iron pot sees its own reflection in the shiny, stainless steel kettle and sees all black (the cast iron).

      So it’s really projection. Calling out others what you see in yourself.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        25·
        1 year ago

        That’s an interpretation from 1876, but the expression is much older than stainless steel. Originally it’s not that the kettle isn’t black, it’s that the pot is equally sooty from the ashes they both sit in. Which is a better fit for MTG and the Boeb, both tarred by the filth of the GOP.

        From Wikipedia:

        Origin

        The earliest appearance of the idiom is in Thomas Shelton’s 1620 translation of the Spanish novel Don Quixote. The protagonist is growing increasingly restive under the criticisms of his servant Sancho Panza, one of which is that “You are like what is said that the frying-pan said to the kettle, ‘Avant, black-browes’.”[3] The Spanish text at this point reads: Dijo el sartén a la caldera, Quítate allá ojinegra (Said the pan to the pot, get out of there black-eyes).[4] It is identified as a proverb (refrán) in the text, functioning as a retort to the person who criticises another of the same defect that he plainly has. Among several variations, the one where the pan addresses the pot as culinegra (black-arse) makes clear that they are dirtied in common by contact with the cooking fire.[5]

        This translation was also recorded in England soon afterwards as “The pot calls the pan burnt-arse” in John Clarke’s collection of proverbs, Paroemiologia Anglo-Latina (1639).

        Wiki goes on to give the 1876 example, with the shiny kettle, as well.