• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    307
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fuck wealthy assholes that think their opinion is more valuable than the rest of us.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s called a plutocracy … a system built on power and those who hold power.

        Whatever it is … it isn’t a democracy.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        6 months ago

        When people talk about the illegitimacy of democracy under capitalism, this scarecrow and her late husband are why.

        How can democracy co-exist in an economic system where orgs are run like dictatorships from the top down, and individuals hold more wealth, power, and influence than entire nation states — despite those orgs employing, and being dependent on, thousands or millions of workers?

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’m no fan of capitalism, but this type of electoral dysfunction seems to run particularly deep in America. There’s many other democracies in capitalist nations that have the basic sense to treat such brazen bribery as a crime.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not. At the end of the day, their vote is still just one of many.

        Fucking vote. Get your friends to vote. Volunteer for a campaign. There are a ton of liberal groups that call people or knock on doors to get out the vote.

        The only thing she has is money which hires… people to get out the vote. Commercials, endorsements, etc. none of that was enough to get Hillary elected. GOTV is what works. Fucking do it.

      • pigup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly, for all literal and realistic practical purposes, their opinion is absolutely more valuable than the rest of us. It’s not that they “think” it is, it’s a simple matter of fact.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          and yet their necks are all roughly the same size as everyone else’s.

          How very curious.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It will go down as one of Republicans most favorite rulings and also the worst ruling the scotus has made… (Insert homer and Bart meme: worst so far.)

      • pigup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They don’t buy the elections. There are way too many people watching the integrity of elections at least at the lower levels. This is why they have to gerrymander things and try tricks like voter ID laws.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well step 1 is wage slaves need to stop worshipping these clowns. Won’t solve the issue but ateast reduce their ability to sway public opinion.

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Seriously - how can any person be so brazenly and thoroughly warped?

    I can only assume that, like so many of the fabulously wealthy, she’s profoundly mentally ill, such that she really can’t grasp the enormous human cost that fulfilling her petty, selfish and ultimately pointless desires would entail. It can only be the case that she genuinely can’t grasp the fact that the millions of people who would be made to suffer or die for this are actual people - actual beings with lives and loved ones who are every bit as important to them as hers are to her.

    It’s either that or she’s genuinely evil, in the purest sense of the word, and on a scale the world has rarely seen.

    So which is it Ms. Adelson? Are you insane or simply evil? There’s absolutely no doubt - none at all - that it’s one or the other.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 months ago

      Psychopathy.

      To get that rich, one needs to be able to think of other people as things. “Human Resources” as such.

      If other people are things then there’s no moral problem “decommissioning” them be it redundancy or killing.

      What would make her evil is, if knowing this, she makes no effort to mitigate it. Given she’s a billionaire: evil.

  • Natanael@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Original title: Miriam Adelson’s Unfinished Business What does the eighth richest woman in the world want?

    The article shows how aggressively anti-peace she is and her beliefs about the land to support the above claim

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean… is it really anti-peace if she wants to end the war? Generally there’s peace for a while after someone completely wins.

      Would people who supported the US joining WW2 so they could wreck the Axis be anti-peace?

      Things to ponder.

      • suchwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The eradication of millions of civilians is definitely anti-peace.

        A similar situation would be the US joining WW2 on the Axis side. I mean once Britain, France, Russia, China, and the Jews were finished off, there’d be peace for a while right?

        Ponder what unconditional support for Israel would mean for Palestinians in our current landscape.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          You joke about the WW2 thing, but yes, that would have resulted in peace as well. Peace is peace, regardless of who wins.

          There was peace after Genghis khan conquered most of Asia too.

          I don’t ponder what unconditional support for Israel would mean for Palestinians in our current landscape, it would mean them being displaced to neighboring countries. Almost exactly the same as is happening in a half dozen other areas of the globe right now. You could displace every single Palestinian and it would still cause fewer refugees than the current number of refugees from Syria’s civil war, which has killed over a half million people.

          I haven’t heard of a single university protest over Syria though.