• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a counterexample, look at the Marina City towers in Chicago (aka the corncobs); all of the units have balconies, and the balconies are definitely a selling point. They’re quite large; in the case of the studios, the balcony can be nearly as large as the living space. (I think that I recently saw a nearly all original condo in Marina City go up for sale in the mid $400s? It was an interesting time capsule.)

  • visnae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    97% of the time, the average car just sits in the parking space, taking up space not being used.

    I guess you can say something similar applied to balconies. They are probably being used, but only a small portion of the day.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Counterexample. We love our little balcony. We have some plants, a bench, and a hummingbird feeder. We take our coffee out there for ‘cocktail hour’ at 7, and sit, talk, watch the world go by a few floors down, and enjoy each other’s company.

    If you’re not using your balcony, you really should.

      • blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There are a tonne of apartment balconies that are just afterthoughts by the developer though. I see plenty that are narrow to the point of being useless, or 30 floors up with no enclosed overhang which just generally feels kinda terrifying.

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    You add tiny, mini, useless balconies so that you can check off another tick box on a zillow or trulia search, justify an increased rental cost.

    Then you make the balconies as small as possible, as featureless as possible, and throw a whole bunch of rules into your rental agreement that prevent you from actually using them for basically any reason: Can’t smoke on the balcony, can’t dry clothes on it, can’t cook on it, can’t display any thing like a flag or banner on the balcony because of some made up aesthetic code, etc.

    I’ve lived in a lot of different apartments of differing quality and location, and while I’m not saying that modern apartment residential balconies are entirely a scam, they very often are.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Can’t smoke on the balcony,

      Because that smoke goes into other people’s apartments. People who may not also be smokers or may have asthma or other medical conditions in which 2nd hand smoke is bad. not actually a building choice… most states now bar smoking inside or near a multi-unit residential building.

      can’t dry clothes on it,

      19 states have some form of “right to dry” legislation, most of which would protect drying on patio space.

      can’t cook on it,

      usually a matter of firecode. where I am, it’s illegal to have wood burning fire pits or charcoal grills, but gas grills are fine. Also, turkey friers.

      These rules are because people are stupid and have caused apartment fires numerous times with these things. can you use charcoal safely? sure. Also, another reason smoking is generally illegal. there’s always that one smoker that forgets to clear out the ashtray every so often and that catches fire. (or they put a tissue in it or something, and that’s not at all fire retardant.)

      can’t display any thing like a flag or banner on the balcony because of some made up aesthetic code, etc.

      not actually legal. if there’s a residential building code that bans political speech (banners, flags, etc) then that’s a first amendment violation. The apartment can (maybe) ban things in their contract agreement, but that’s not a building code. that’s a contract agreement, and as long as it’s not exactly graphic, it probably falls into the “unenforceable” category.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        that’s a first amendment violation

        It is a first amendment violation when THE STATE and ONLY THE STATE restricts your expression. You can absolutely have your expression restricted by private agreements that you willingly enter into.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          When it’s a private agreement, that’s not BUILDING CODE.

          Read my comment again.

          Building codes are regulations imposed by city, state, or federal governments. Not by HOAs or landlords. If there is a building code that restricts political speech, it’s a first amendment violation.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        19 states have some form of “right to dry” legislation, most of which would protect drying on patio space.

        Two points which I would like to interject here:

        1. OP (of either the post or comment above) may not be in the United States, and

        2. Even if they are, there are 50 states and 1 capital district. That means those 19 states only make up roughly a third of the United States. Odds are they are not in one of them.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Fair enough.

          though, my understanding is that the opposition to clotheslines is a mostly US thing. Especially in places where the weather is warm year-round. (specifically its the HOA’s because HOA’s are the devil.)

          edit: also, there’s no state here that forbids the practice. (there may be cities that do, but I imagine those are in places like… florida. Government small enough to fit in your backyard.)

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            My house is in an HOA. I’m not allowed to have a clothesline.

            I do anyway. It’s on my screened in porch, and not visible unless you’re climbing trees in my backyard. And if you are, fuck you, I’ll walk around naked all day if I goddamn well please.

          • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            though, my understanding is that the opposition to clotheslines is a mostly US thing. Especially in places where the weather is warm year-round.

            That’s fair. I’m not personally knowledgeable about said rules; I just thought I’d point out those couple things.

            (specifically its the HOA’s because HOA’s are the devil.)

            Agreed. I would say they need to go fuck themselves with a cactus, but really now. What did the cactus ever do to deserve that?

      • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        interesting that charcoal is banned but gas is fine. I’ve never had the grease accumulated on the bottom of the grill catch fire on a charcoal grill, but with a gas grill…

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          gas can be turned off, charcoal can’t.

          it’s caused way more fires than uncleaned gas grills. mostly because people go inside to eat and forget about the coals (an then the wind comes up or something happens and sparks fly).

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My friend had a balcony so small that one person had to crab walk out sideways and then a second person could stand in front of the door. We still stood out there and smoked though. The view was nice.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I figure Jeff Bezos and Nestle ARE guilty of so much evil shit that they get away with, that it’s not actually in bad faith to blame them for things they had nothing to do with. They can accept blame for SOMETHING for once in their miserable god damned evil lives.

          As for Clooney…well he’s just a smug bastard, and my Clooney bashing is well known here on Lemmy.

          So you CAN blame them all for whatever it was we were talking about. Doesn’t make it true…per se…but you CAN blame them for it! Because fuck them anyways!

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    In some places that is a strategy to satisfy zoning requirements. The builder has to provide a minimum amount of outdoor area per dwelling unit. They could create a large ground-level courtyard, or they can create a bunch of tiny balconies that sum up to the same total area. The ladder latter strategy allows a larger building to exist on the same lot.

    Edit: Stupid voice-to-text always gets me.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      A different design other than a basic box would allow them to make a large outdoor area at basically any level they want, not necessarily the ground, but that’s of course more expensive as well.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I think people value private outdoor space differently than public outdoor space. I don’t actually have a balcony but I think I would usually prefer a private space to a public one, even if the public one was much nicer.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It helps a lot if the balcony is somewhat enclosed. The balconies that are just iron fences with no privacy at all are basically useless.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        so like, even if it were a box…

        They don’t really have to encase each floor. most buildings are concrete, and they could just as easily seal that floor off and leave the observation platform open. But the reality is that it gets pretty windy up that high, and most people won’t want to be out there for very long at all. And not at all if it’s at all inclement.

        not to mention… jumpers.

    • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I occasionaly hear about people having their freezer out on the balcony. It makes sense for colder countries, as the temperature difference would be lower than if it were inside. But on the other hand, I’m pretty sure most freezers are not built to endure weather.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    People want the option to use their balcony. Then they realize it’s usually not so pleasant being exposed like that to the sun, wind, temp.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      … or just ‘exposed’. to neighbors, passers-by, and the pervert in the corner office across the street.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Heh, I walk around naked with the blinds open because where I live, people would need binoculars to see me and if they choose to, their resulting suffering is their own fault. One advantage of being unattractive…

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I was annoyed at this local news investigation about a high rise neighbor complaining about another walking around naked with the blinds open. They had footage blured out but when you saw them talk with the “irate” neighbor you could tell they must of had to have put the camera right up to the window. Its like wtf you see the guy because your pressing you face against your glass to get a look. No way you see him if you casually hanging in your place.

      • 200ok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There’s definitely a guy in the building across from me that stares. I don’t think he’s a creep – he’s probably just bored and looking around – but his face is pressed up against the window so he stands out. I’ve made eye contact a few times, ugh.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Joke’s on them! I’ll stare into their telescope and out-perv them any day of the week…

    • 200ok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Agreed! They’re always filthy/dusty and annoying to clean.

      And even though no one gives a shit enough to stare, it’s hard not to feel… watched.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I don’t sit on my balcony despite the table and chairs I have out there, but I have lots of plants that soften the view and spark joy. It’s also a place the firefighters could pluck me from.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I wanted a balcony but the real estate agent politely implied that I couldn’t afford one in the area where I was looking for housing. With that said, I can see myself using it for just an hour or two a week while the weather is nice. I like the idea of sitting out on the balcony but I expect that in practice it would be noisy out there and boring on my own.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Me too. I have an outstanding rocking chair out there for reading. We also have a tiny table between two chairs, perfect for drinks.

      Edit: I just set a reminder for tomorrow morning to go out before it gets warm.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    That’s funny. I see all the skyscrapers around here with balconies and I get jealous, but I never thought about the fact that I almost never see people on those balconies until I read your question.