President Biden’s hypocrisy on full display: Pardons his own son after making a point about ‘independent’ justice"

In a move that’s being hailed as a “full and unconditional” pardon, President Joe Biden has announced that he’s granting his son Hunter Biden a free pass for all federal charges related to his time between 2014-2024. Just 50 days before leaving office, Biden had previously declared that he wouldn’t be making the move, stating he’d abide by the jury’s decision. But now, it seems he was just playing a different tune.

TL;DR

President Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, who was facing up to 25 years in prison for lying on a federal form about his drug addiction. This comes after months of saying he wouldn’t make the move, and is being met with criticism from politicians and others who called him out on his earlier stance. A case of “my family is more important than I am” - how about keeping your promises for once?

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Despite what Biden may try and spin this as, this is not just about the (aggressively politicized and pursued) 4473 ‘unlawful user’ perjury charge - otherwise why include the years prior to that act?

    President Joe Biden’s son is charged with lying about his drug use in October 2018 on a form to buy a gun that he kept for about 11 days in Delaware

    Because Biden pardoned him from 2014 to present, it also includes the known tax evasion and FARA illicit lobbying concerns.

    The Justice Department on Tuesday [June 18th 2023] said the investigation into Hunter Biden was “ongoing” even as it announced terms of a plea agreement [for gun and tax charges]

    DoJ felt that there was more to investigate even if the tax and gun charges were covered in a plea deal. Read: there’s something there regarding Hunter’s lobbying efforts - and from internal Burisma emails he knew about the law and FARA concerns.

    In the same April 2014 email, Hunter Biden indicated that Burisma’s officials “need to know in no uncertain terms that we will not and cannot intervene directly with domestic policymakers, and that we need to abide by FARA and any other U.S. laws in the strictest sense across the board.”

    Biden is right that most 4473 charges would never get this far - what he’s cynically not pointing out (from the bully pulpit, lame duck or not) is the context of why prosecutors drop gun charges in plea deals or pursue maximal charges at trial, or the wider criminal case against his son.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      The simple truth is, the entire case against Hunter Biden was politically motivated from the start.

      He paid the back taxes and the gun charges are normally laughed out of court.

      This was always a Republican prosecutor wanting to make a name for themselves, and with Trump taking power, well, we all know how vindictive Trump is.

      I don’t expect this pardon to matter much, Trump and the Republicans don’t care about law or tradition or reality. They care about power, and are less than 2 months away from it.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        You’re missing my point, Biden did not give his failson a targeted pardon nor a blanket universal pardon for his whole lifetime. The gun charge stems from a crime in 2018. The tax charge is from as early as 2015. The illegal lobbying/FARA investigation stretches to at least 2014. Witch hunt investigation or not, it was sustained into federal charges and was going to trial, out of a California circuit court - not Texas or Alabama.

        If this pardon is just about the gun charge, as Biden alleges, why extend it back beyond 2018 and into 2014 when the alleged FARA/lobbying crimes were committed? Or if he’s so concerned about his son’s future unjust prosecution under a Trump DoJ, why is Biden blithely consenting to handing over power to Trump after the Supreme Court gave him near unlimited executive power?

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So glad Biden is so concerned about following the law that protecting vulnerable people with his newly granted immunity is something he would never consider doing.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Oh right, Republicans went after his family and he still picked Garland as his AG.

  • SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Nice. Hopefully Biden keeps doing more good shit in his remaining few weeks while the MAGAt snowflakes are triggered and distracted by Hunter’s dick again.

  • MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It would have been nice if he could have used his presidential powers

    to prevent the genocide…

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Or to change that stupid ATF form 4473 which basically requires anyone who smokes weed to either commit a felony by lying (checking the box for they don’t use illegal drugs) or tell the truth (checking the box that they do) and being unable to purchase a firearm. Unfortunately the war on law abiding gun owners had to continue so on a few occasions their position continued to be that marijuana users should not be allowed to buy or own firearms.

      Hypocrisy+++++

  • Dragomus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Biden knows they will come after himself but he’s too old so they will slam the hammer on his son with the maximum force they can get out of it, this is a good way to thwart that political attack.

    Also, someone should remind Trump that he handled firearms after he was convicted of a felony and was not prosecuted for that …

    Though I don’t think the importance of that fact will dawn on Trump, he never felt rules applied to him.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Good decision. Trump and his gang promised all kinds of revenge. They don’t play by the rules. So it makes sense to do whatever for your last son.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If we’re going to start abusing presidential power preemptively, can we get some sort of executive protections for trans rights or waiving student loans? Things that’ll help someone other than the addict failson?

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Canceling student loans would be hard to undo though. If we’re shutting down the Department of education anyway… who’s keeping track?

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Agreed. If Hunter Biden’s issues hadn’t been politically weaponized so much, I doubt Biden would have done it, but the truth is, with Trump coming in to office and threatening retaliation, it makes sense to pardon him.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The crimes Hunter was charged with are rarely enforced and rarely involve jail time. The Republican’s made this a political circus that would have certainly had Hunter doing time. If it wasn’t for that, Joe would not have needed to pardon him.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think the issue a lot of us have with this is less that he’s stooping to Trump’s level, and more that he’s only doing it to help his own family. Abusing the office of the president is apparently fine and good if its done on behalf of someone who’s name is Biden, but the rest of the planet can get fucked.

      • Sauerkraut
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mostly agree. This is abuse of Presidential power so it is hypocritical for liberals to deny that… But, at the same time, if I were in Biden’s situation I would likely do the same. And here is why:

        1. It is his son. His last son. Of course any loving father will do whatever they can to protect their son.

        2. Why should Democrats care what Republicans think? Democrats are getting curb stomped by fascists who give zero shit about the integrity of our institutions or abuse of political power. They truly don’t. People voted for a pedophile felon traitorous oligarch. If you agree to an honorable sparring match of fisty-cuffs and your opponent pulls out a glock and shoots you in the knees and the crowd cheers for the cheater, do you have any moral or pragmatic reason to keep playing by the rules? No.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is he though? Isn’t one of the purposes of presidential pardons to protect a person from unjust political persecution. If Republicans weren’t Trump’s party I would agree it’s nepotism, but it is Trump’s party who will be in power. Trump has vowed to seek revenge on his opponents. Joe Biden is too old to really be punished as much as the Republicans want him to be, but Hunter Biden has many years left. MAGA Republicans could punish him for their hate of his father for at least four years, if not the rest of his life. Isn’t that one of the purposes of a presidential pardon?

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean… there’s another read on this whole thing, too: “huh, I guess everyone voted for nepotism and insider deals, so why the fuck not, especially in this context?”

        Biden’s just giving the electorate a preview of what they voted for.

    • yarr@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Good decision. Trump and his gang promised all kinds of revenge. They don’t play by the rules. So it makes sense to do whatever for your last son.

      I would hope those that oppose Trump do not just adopt all his behaviors.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean I fucking hate Biden’s guts but it literally makes no sense to leave his son at the victim of Trump. Whatever Hunter was getting was never going to be justice either way.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Didn’t the Justice Department originally decide not to pursue charges until Republicans threw a fit? Seems like it was already a politically motivated prosecution, so I have no issues with a political pardon.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This shows that none of the 2 parties believe that the democratic system in the USA works anymore.
          Which means, it’s dead now.

          • Sauerkraut
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Biden winning in 2020 gave us hope that people were realizing that fascists are full of shit and that they lie about everything, but Trump winning last month has shattered any faith or hope I had left in our two party system. It is hard to believe in a system when people are relentlessly assaulted with right wing propaganda year after year and then ultimately vote for a convicted felon pedo traitorous oligarch who denies climate science.

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yes, it is. So the Democrats, and anyone else who wants to try and resurrect it, need to get off their asses and start fighting dirty to rebuild it. The Republicans have been fighting to tear it down for more than 40 years using endless dirty tricks. Time to fight fire with fire. We cannot save democracy with sternly worded letters.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Fight fire with fire, if you keep going high the other party will realize it means they can go low and you’ll never do anything about it.

        • yarr@feddit.nlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I hate this approach and would rather lose. The high road is the only road. I take it not because it is easy, but because it is worthwhile.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If the republicans don’t like this, the democrats will happily support a supermajority legislature vote that starts limiting executive power.

  • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    ITT: people who ignored the persecution Hunter has faced and are judging this on only an extremely shallow level

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think he’s concerned Trumps DOJ is going to come after them. Still super shady. But that’d be my guess as to why he did it, beyond the whole, he’s my kid thing.

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Should be illegal to pardon family members honestly. If there was ever an easy example of a conflict of interest, this is one.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d say make it illegal to pardon people who committed crimes to protect you (Ollie North, half Trump’s advisors) first.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So what? Maybe it should be but it isn’t. The Constitution places virtually no limitation on the Presidents ability to offer clemency and no one in the last 250 years or so has seen fit to amend the constitution to change that despite the fact that the Republicans have been abusing the power of the pardon since at least the Reagan years. Now you are complaining because a Democratic President has used it *appropriately *to pardon someone who was convicted in a politically motivated circus?

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          For Biden, it was the most difficult decision of his presidency. For Trump, it was Tuesday.

        • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yep, absolutely. Presidential powers should be used for the good of the country, not the good of your friends and family. There are many legitimate reasons to pardon people but them being related to you is not one of them.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            A fair point but do you think Hunter would have been prosecuted to the same extent if he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden?

            However, it may work out better in the end for him that they went after him for ALL the crimes, because now he’s pardoned for all of them and can’t be tried for them again. We know Trump wants to go after Joe, but he’ll have to come from a different direction.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              11 hours ago

              If he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden he wouldn’t have had the lifetime of cushy boardroom and lobbyist jobs to lead to being persecuted.

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                You’re not going to solve nepotism by showing a picture of Hunter’s dong in Congress.

                • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Oh no, the millionaire was prosecuted for breaking the law.

                  Oh and don’t forget the unpaid taxes they were after him for as well.

                  Why is everyone so mean to the millionaire presidents son, he has it rough.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            For the good of the country? This was literally always just a judgement call. “I think they deserve a pardon” is the only criteria there ever was. I’m sure there are examples you could claim were good for the country somehow, but I’m not sure how common that is

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    didn’t we, i of course mean the people who showed up, vote for this very kind of behaviour in the last presidential election? what’s sauce for the goose…

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I’m not an American, and as such I don’t think it’s my thing to speak on so do not take this as an instructive comment, but I will reflect on it anyway. I believe that this was, on balance, a bad decision even if I understand it and can find good, honest reasons for Biden to do it. In the end, the POTUS has this power and is free to use it as the president wishes. I hope it will lead to something positive.

    The fact that Trump has said that he might pardon Hunter and now is complaining about the fact that Biden did it himself shows once again how everything said by Donald is a convenient temporary truth. Even if this puts the light on Biden also being problematic with this behavior.

    edit: a word

    • Yodan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s a poison pill for pardons. Either they are essentially absolute and irreversible, or they aren’t and all of the ones Trump made and will make are up for debate. He can grumble all he wants but for Trump to call this pardon “such an abuse and miscarriage of justice” is absolutely laughable given the decade of insanity and illegal stuff coming out of his orange anus. The toilet photo of all the documents should have been enough to jail this man for life in a black site but I guess justice is a miscarriage after all.