• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ugh, I’m one of those people who will defend imperial as not being irrational, just built ad-hoc for purposes that aren’t in alignment with modern ones and … No, that’s not what Fahrenheit is.

    Fahrenheit was trying to make a temperature scale that was easy to recreate to ease the calibration of thermometers. Zero is a temperature that can be created in your garage with some ice, salt and water. 100 was his best, ultimately inaccurate, attempt to measure human body temperature, since it’s another easy calibration point, and from there water was defined as 32 and 212 so that they were 180 degrees apart, which would fit will on a temperature dial.
    Not irrational, not a comfort scale, and not in alignment with current needs.

    It’s pure coincidence that it kinda lines up with comfortable outdoor temperatures in the opinion of a good chunk of a population living in the northern part of the western hemisphere.

    • Swedneck
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      i’ve never understood how people imagine an easier scale to calibrate than celsius, what is easier than freezing and boiling water??

      Human body temperature isn’t an easy calibration point, are you gonna shove it up your ass to calibrate it, or what?

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, first off he wasn’t actually doing it after Celsius existed as a temperature scale. He made it a solid 18 years beforehand.
        Second, there are some issues. Specifically, ice freezes at 0, but it doesn’t stop getting colder. So if you have a bit of ice, that doesn’t tell you the temperature, just that it’s below a threshold. Boiling is more convenient because liquid water can’t get above 100, but you do have to consider side pressure.
        Fahrenheit used brine because as it freezes it forces salt out of the ice, making it more resistant to freezing. It self stabilizes its temperature, which is immensely handy.

        None of the people designing their scales envisioned that using the basic reference points for common calibration would be a thing. Just like how we don’t calibrate them with brine, ice, steam or butts today, instead relying on how we marked down how electrical resistance changes as a function of temperature and then calibrated reference numbers to get the scale right.

        It’s important to remember that the people in the past were largely not stupid, they simply hadn’t found out something we take for granted or they had priorities that we don’t.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah we know it’s a coincidence. That’s kinda a part of the joke. No need to flex your knowledge here Mr smarty pants

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    100% hot by what understanding? If I set my oven to 100F, the peak of heat by this memes reckoning, that roast chicken is going to kill my family.

    If I run a warm bath at 50F, the medium-est of heats, My testicles are going to implode faster than a billionaire in a homemade submarine when they touch the water.

    If we are talking human comfort, then 50F is also way too cold to be considered “50% hot”.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only temperature system that isn’t arbitrary would tell you how spreadable butter is. Zero degrees butter is utterly not spreadable while 100 degrees butter is the maximum spreadability it could achieve before melting.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s like the difference between being in the blast radius of a fission bomb vs a hydrogen bomb. Does the size of the blast really matter glfrom ground zero?

      When it’s 100 degrees outside, I avoid the outside as much as possible. If it’s 120 degrees outside, I avoid the outside as much as possible.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Americans using the word propaganda for “something I don’t understand because my school system failed me so now I overcompensate by making up factoids that make me look even more uneducated by the rest of the world”

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Americans using the word propaganda for “something I don’t understand because my school system failed me so now I overcompensate by making up factoids that make me look even more uneducated by the rest of the world”

      Whoosh.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m geniunly curious why you are getting down voted. The “propaganda” word choice is clearly part of the joke.

        I mean, I wish we used C instead of F, but this take is still a whoosh.

        • person420@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m curious, why? I think metric makes sense in most regards but I like the granularity of F. The difference between 70F and 75F is pretty noticeable, but in C, it’s like what? 1 degree?

          • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Because my partner uses C. The constant jump scares from temps is annoying 😀

            Separate from that, I use temps for what to wear, so exactness is less important to me. In truth AQI and humidity are much more important metrics to me.

            Plus:

            • Equipment temps are always in C
            • Using C is a gateway to metric use
            • Devices built for C are just… better. Example: Any washing machine for C has the temperatures listed on the settings vs the ever so useful “warm” or “colors”
            • Kettle boils when it hits 3 digits. More fun.

            So, lots of ancillary reasons I guess, vs any one direct reason.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 days ago

      that’s when the two scales collide…

      -40FC…

      ‘fucking cold’

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      I understand you’re being sassy but below zero you do start saying “no but seriously, how can it be this cold?” Zero is about the lower limit before temperature stops being distinguishable and just becomes cold

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        8 days ago

        The feeling of cold weather is entirely subjective. A Brazilian from Bahia will wear a winter coat and feel cold at 20C, but somebody from northern Canada would be going out for a swim in their shorts.

        Which is why any attempt at using “oh it means cold percentage” or “oh below zero it just feels the same” is extremely dumb and a easily refutable attempt at saving a bad scale.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Point was, doesn’t matter who you are or where you’re from, once it gets to -40 it’s “fucking cold” to literally everyone

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yup. We were at an event and it was a hot weekend, mid 30’s C, sunny, so we were in shorts and staying in the shade. My sister, who had just come back from a tour in Afghanistan, was wearing a sweater and shivering.

        • definitelynotavampire@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          I grew up in the Northeastern US. I lived in the Southeastern US for a few years. My first year there it was 65F in March and everyone was still in their winter coats with scarves and hats commenting that they couldn’t wait for spring and I was in a t shirt with sweat literally rolling down my arms and face and I remember saying “wait, this isn’t spring?”

      • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 days ago

        There is a BIG difference between 0F, -20F and -40F. And as someone that has worked in areas that has often seen -60F, -20F feels like spring in comparison, the local Inuit wouldn’t even wear a jacket at 0F.

        • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          It is funny how 40 in the fall sees most folks bundling up with everything they have, and 40 the spring is shorts and sandals weather.

          I don’t stop wearing shorts until it’s about 0F out or the wind is insane. Not to like shovel the driveway or anything being out for extended periods, but going out shopping or whatever is fine. Today was 0 with a -20 windchill and my Costco run was done in shorts, a sweatshirt, and a baseball cap.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I like how they claimed Fahrenheit made sense by relating it to a scale between 0 and 100 because a grade divided into 100 pieces (centigrade) is a system that is easy to handle. If only there was a unit of measurement that was already like that.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      No they’re relating average earth temperature/weather to a centigrade scale, instead of relating liquid water to one.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I might catch flak for this, but I understand Fahrenheit made a ton of sense of an illiterate bygone era (well, I guess coming back maybe)

      The vast majority of people were uneducated. Decimals were a non-starter, maybe negatives were also difficult?

      0-100 was very easy. Under 0? Don’t go outside if possible. Over 100? Don’t go outside if possible. >50/halfway? Time for a coat. Having the same scale from -15 to 40 might have been confusing and not centered for them?

        • offspec@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah but I can’t be -10% naked, at 0°f I’m 0% naked, I have on all the layers that I could possibly layer. At 100°F I want to be 100% naked, minimal clothing socially required because it’s hot outside. My outfit might change from 90 to 100, but after 100 I’m capped out on what I can remove before I need to either move to a place that allows public nudity or just resolve myself to public indecency charges. At 32°F I can still run out to the mailbox in shorts and a hoodie, that’s not 0% naked that’s frankly still a long ways away from fully clothed.

  • m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    You guys are too ignorant to see how full of shit OP is.

    50F is not 50% hot, it’s cold. If your house was 50F you’d be saying “something is wrong with my HVAC”. You’d never heat to only 50, and you’d never cool that far. It’s cellar temperature (colder than a wine cellar, warmer than a root cellar).

    70F is 50% hot. It’s a temp you’d cool to in the summer, and a temp you’d heat to in the winter.

    100F isn’t 100% hot either, most people enjoy a hottub to be a little hotter.

    Tldr: OP is wrong

    • LordPassionFruit@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      50°F is when I might start wearing pants instead if shorts. I will still be wearing a t-shirt, and won’t bring a jacket until at least 40°F.

      70°F is the hottest it can be outside before I become uncomfortably warm.

      When I get in a hot tub that is at 100°F, I will turn it down to at least 95°F and know that I won’t be able to stay much longer.

      This is the other problem with Fahrenheit, there is no universal “100% hot”. While Celsius doesn’t have the granularity and is subject to “just ask water how it feels” criticism, at least “what temperature is water” is a consistent way to explain it as opposed to saying “at 100°, you’ll be hot”

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        32 percent hot is water freezing tho? Idk… 1/3 hot seems like not the right amount for water freezing.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You clown, hot has been defined as 100°F since 1724. Therefore 50°F = 50% hot.

  • chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Celsius is the perfect system to describe how hot or cold it is, assuming you’re a water molecule.