• Maetani@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    While there’s no doubt tires are bad for the environment, a quarter of all microplastics seems a lot, especially since plastic is everywhere. Gladly there’s a source for that claim, a link to tireindustryproject’s FAQ… Claiming that this number is a gross overestimation. What the fuck is this article? Is it supposed to be satire or something?

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is also yet another reason SUVs are bad: bigger tyres, higher weight, more wear, more pollution.

    It’s also another reason to have lower speed limits: less friction, less wear, less pollution.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You want trains because they are good for the environment.

      I want trains because chugga chugga choo choo.

      We are not the same.

  • Lun0tic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Tires also used to last longer. They are designed to wear out faster now.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Those reusable grocery bags made from recycled plastic? Disintegrates into dust eventually. And in your household to while it does so.

      Use either natural fiber or nylon(more durable and by default, PFAS free).

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I use a 40L messenger backpack for my groceries with a cotton bag inside for anything that doesn’t fit.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Watch half the people in this sub completely scroll past your comment ignoring the fact that they are contributing to being insane amount of microplastics in our blood currently

      Y’all don’t stand for shit

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I watch you accusing me of the same thing in the other comment, since you probably scrolled past my username. Hypocrite.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yes, though note that tire and road wear scale with the 4th power of the vehicle weight. If a person on a bicycle weighs 200 pounds and a person driving a car weighs 2000 pounds then the car is going to have roughly 10,000 times as much tire wear (and microplastic shedding) as the bike.

      Now consider that people on bikes can even weigh less than 200 pounds and cars can weigh far more than 2000 pounds (I heard of a recent electric SUV that weighs 8000 pounds) and it becomes clear that bicycles are a complete non-issue, relative to cars. An 8000 pound car is equivalent to 6.25 million 160 pound bicycle + rider pairings.

      Now consider the effects of 18-wheeler tractor tailors with a maximum weight upwards of 80,000 pounds. These things absolutely disintegrate their tires. If you’ve done any highway driving you’ve likely seen the shredded debris of tires on the shoulder of the road.

      Edit: as an addendum I’d like to note that electric vehicles tend to weigh a lot more than ICE cars, by upwards of 1000 pounds. This is one of the reasons I’m dismayed at the rush to EVs: it’s going to accelerate the microplastic problem even as it reduces CO2.

      • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yes i agree. I have never driven but have been i a car due to medical reasons, but have rode a bike and plan to bike again once im a weight that a bike can sustain (im 370 right now). ive seen thoese tire “husks” on the highway sometimes.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Geez, here is another issue for which we’ve known about for 40 or so years that requires “urgent Action” for the past 40 years already

    Wake me up when we finally do something

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Boomers have categorically chosen apathy in favor of their own self interests since 1970. By the late 90s, they were a wrecking ball.

      • Sauerkraut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I disagree. People who live their entire lives being relentless bombarded by consumerist propaganda and pro-capitalist disinformation are not truly free to vote against it, nor were they given the chance. Al Gore cared more about the environment than Bush, but he was still a capitalist that supported car dependency and the military industrial complex.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          Which is why replacing First-past-the-post voting is so important. We need to have more then two options.

          Democrats believe in democracy right? What’s the hold up blue states?

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          So you’re absolving “Generation Me” of ever having to think for themselves? The same generation that could have educated themselves for less than the price of new car, and simply chose not to because a high school diploma was enough?

          Millennials were just as heavily, if not more propagandized, and yet, as a cohort, we have skewed far from Baby Boomers (ie Millenials are killing x), while retaining the ability to be critical of the systems we have inherited. We are also far more educated and far more in debt. All as a result of Boomers subsidizing their own welfare on the backs of their children and grandchildren.

          Baby Boomers collectively failed upward, soaked up benefit after benefit while telling themselves that they deserved their station in life, and then pulled up every ladder behind them.

          So, hard disagree.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You might as well just take the long nap.

      No ones gonna do anything.

      We’re gonna keep wringing our hands about it, desperately shout time is running out…and watch time run out, then shrug our shoulders and go “Welp, nothing we can do about it now”

      • Sauerkraut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We need to convince billionaires to care. They are the ones who hold all the real political power.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          they dont care about anything but their money and the bunkers where they think they’ll hide during the coming man made disasters

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          nah, guilliotines exist.

          we dont actually have to take orders from them.

  • lnxtx@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If only there was an alternative.
    What if we replace vulcanized rubber with a metal ring 🤔

  • maniii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Vulcanized RUBBER tyres shed PLASTIC microparticles … hmmmm something sounds very rubbery and not at all plasticky… i truly wonder what it could be …hmmmm…

    Edit: “Is rubber considered a plastic? Although materials such as rubber, textiles, adhesives, and paint may in some cases meet this definition, they are not considered plastics.”

    Here is a Scientific study MIS-CONSTRUING Rubber as a Plastic AND MAKING ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT PROPER EXPLANATIONS !!!

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5664766/

    This is the problem with Scientific studies, Media, Reporting and bunch of people running with studies that make a lot of FALSE ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT TELLING YOU THE FULL FUCKING STORY.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Daddy I’m so sorry microplastics in your bloodstream are causing your untimely demise…

      mic

      miiii

      Yes Daddy?

      they’re MICRO rubbers you ignorant IDIOT

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is the problem with Scientific studies, Media, Reporting and bunch of people running with studies that make a lot of FALSE ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT TELLING YOU THE FULL FUCKING STORY.

      ah, but randos online know the real story. The Caplocks only adds to your authenticity. Look, you’re trying to ague about semantics to discredit concerns about microplastics getting in people’s blood streams. Within the context of micro particials, there’s really not much difference between “rubber” and “plastic” as what makes them unique to each other is their properties when bonded in large forms. Maybe it’s harmless or maybe it’s this generation’s lead poisons, toxoplasmosis, or aspectos. Aspectos, which by the way, is perfectly natural, but still dangerous to humans. Something I have to remind people when they talk about corn oil based plastics. The half life on PLA may be shorter, but research is still being done on how quickly harm happens and what levels harm can occur.

    • Affidavit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      hi HOW ARE you TODAY?

      i’m pretty GOOD MYSELF!!111!!!

      I TOO like to RANDOMLY SWITCH TO upper case.

      I HOPE YOU RECOVER SOON!

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Rubber can mean both, natural rubber from specific trees, or synthetic rubber, which is made out of plastics.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Again there is a difference even when you say synthetic rubber,

        DO NOT MIX AND CONFUSE RUBBER and PLASTIC.

        Rubber === mixture of ISOPRENE and ELASTOMERE polymers ( naturally occurring from Latex/rubber trees but 50% naturally produced and 50% synthetically produced from petrochemicals)

        Plastic === mixture of various Ethyl,Propyl,Poly-Propyl Polymers mainly derived synthetically from petrochemical sources ( may or may not be combined with elastomere for rubberized properties).

        So MOST MODERN Industrial processes are DIRTY and HEAVILY POLLUTING.

        Dont confuse Rubber and Plastic manufacturing and lump it into a single problem unless and until you have definitive and REPRODUCIBLE PROOF THAT PROBLEMS ARE COMMON TO BOTH.

          • 4lan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Is that your only retort to being shut down with logic? I love the spirit of this sub but the people in here are so unbearable

            Is all of your clothing natural fibers? I guarantee you are shedding pounds of microplastics into the environment every year personally

            Got a goretex jacket? You are killing the earth with PFAs

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Shut down with logic? My entire comment was about differentiating between natural and synthetic rubbers and he wrote an entire wall of text about how I have to differentiate between natural and synthetic rubbers.

              And yes, except for a couple jackets, which I don’t really wash at all, all my clothes, bed sheets etc. are out of 100% cotton. Always have been. My top level comment in this very thread is literally me calling out synthetic textiles. Any other things you want to project onto me?

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Thanks for the link that argues against your rant. I guess you could salvage it some by comparing the numbers and claiming the plastic component is lower than the main article’s numbers in contribution. It would be awkward though if you find out they already separated those number in their math. It also doesn’t change the point that a huge amount of pollution in the form of tire wear occurs constantly and isn’t going away anytime soon.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The study linked in the article also says that microplastic and rubber are different. As far as I understood it, they also quoted it wrong.

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Exactly. We need more and better peer-reviewed and vetted studies. Is rubber pollution exactly same as micro-plastics? Or is it 80% the same effects? Is it the same effects due to the same chemicals? Is it similar due to the same processes and not necessarily the end-product material ? Many many questions that people don’t seem to understand and just blindly trust whatever some “latest study shows …” bullshit that has been going on for a very long time.

    • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Microrubbers sounds like condoms for guys with unfortunate situations in their pants though

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Maybe we need a new study of “Forever chemicals” and “Short-term chemicals” and “Long-lived chemicals” redefined and not use confusing terms like “microplastics” for anything polymerised. DNA is a polymer but we dont call people microplastics.

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sure we might have microplastics and microrubbers inside our brains and balls.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Imagine things being made of multiple components and not one pure component. /s

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Imagine confusing Tigers and Lions and claiming BIG CAT micro-pussies are causing problems all over the world!!!

        Tigers are different and Lions are different. They are big cats but different species have different habitats and habits.

        So dont mix Plastics and Rubbers when they are chemically different and may have different manufacturing processes.

        Was that really hard to understand ?

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I worked at a tire factory. Half the rubber used in tires is synthetic rubber, which is made from plastic. Your car tires are not made from 100% natural rubber from a tree.

          • maniii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Synthetic rubber is not plastic. It is from petrochemicals but not the same chemical substance.

            • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              A plastic is just a material made from polymers, you are the one adding artificial limitations on what polymers can be used. The belts in tires use both nylon and polyester which are both plastics by anyone’s definition. So even by your strict definition, tires are made up, at least in part, by plastic.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Was that really hard to understand ?

          … umm, yes. I have literally no idea what you’re talking about.