• Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    351
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you guys remember back when Elon insisted he was a Free Speech Absolutist? How he wanted to ensure nobody was censored on Twitter? That shit just gets funnier every day.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    227
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If that’s an actual photo from today then I doubt he was grazed much because I skinned my knee biking the day before his rally. I’ve still got a giant scab there.

    Also Pete Souza isn’t just anyone. He’s a former director of the White House photo office.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, my content was way up when I joined Twitter, before Musk. I deleted it and took the financial hit, don’t want customers from that user base now anyway

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even just mirroring their stuff to one of the Twitter alternatives would be nice

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What!? Why? That’s worse. That amplifies it. The world needs less horrible hate.

        It also does nothing to stop the news outlets from sourcing twitter

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      At the end of the day incentives are incentives. All the engineers Elon fired when he took over did in fact build a site that’s really good for announcing things like news to the world, and it was really quite complex behind the scenes. And if someone wants to replicate that, it’s a lot of work with the added problem that unlike the original Twitter, they have to compete with Twitter in building a new network. Additionally, social media news just isn’t very profitable which is why Meta/Threads has discouraged news and politics. So unfortunately Twitter is really all there is, social media news now essentially has a strong built-in right wing bias for the foreseeable future.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I really hate when news articles embed tweets directly as a source, it’s blocked by Privacy Badger, so I only see an article full of holes. Why can’t they use screenshots?

    • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      When they don’t also deepthroat Netflix after they banned password sharing. All the optimistic people, me included, said “oh this will make a huge dent in Netflix what a stupid move.” But they read the room like a hawk.

      People swallowed the hook and signed up in huge numbers. https://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-password-sharing-crackdown-worked-how-to-increase-subscription-streaming-2024-1

      The West has created the perfect neutered, obedient consumers who will drink whatever coolade they are given. Until we have enough people who are willing to challenge convenience and stop bowing at the altar of comfort, we will have no meaningful change.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        You even got people on the left saying “I won’t vote for the less bad politician unless he makes me excited to vote”. When did everyone get so selfish?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Got people in the center being like “we love bad politicians because they do everything we want. Fuck you, you’re voting like we tell you” and then they expect that shit to work.

          Look at what happened when the party listened and gave us a candidate who could fog a mirror and who might not be as happy with genocide as centrists want.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          One doesn’t need to be a Leftie to be wary of voting for a guy supporting with weapons ethno-Fascists commiting mass murder, including bombing playgrounds and sniping children playing in their own homes, even if the other guy is also a Fascist.

          It’s not by chance that merelly replacing Biden it Kamala quickly started to bring back such voter.

          The only way to think that being in the least of ways humane and not agreeing with mass murder of children is a “leftwing” thing is if you live in a country with an Overtoon Window shifted so far to the right that almost all of the political spectrum is either Fascism or pro-Oligarchy.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I too am a very left leftist and that’s why this election I will check notes do exactly what the far right rightists want by voting for a third party. There will be no genocide after we elect Jill Stein, which is realistic because if she had triple the popular votes last time she could have beat libertarian Gary Johnson. There is no possible downside because there will certainly be no genocide with the far right rightists running on a platform of bigotry while saying they will have dictatorship, that Israel should nuke Gaza, that the world should let Russia run roughshod over Ukraine.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m agreeing with you, friend. Mathematically only one of two candidates has any chance whatsoever. That’s why I, a very far left leftist, will do exactly what is desired by the further right of the two parties. That will achieve leftism because of reasons.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re right. The people who put their principles above Palestinian lives aren’t left wing. They’re centrists. An actual leftist puts helping others first. Voting Democrat reduces the harm that others suffer. Abstaining does nothing to help anyone. But there are some people who will choose to let brown people in the middle east die, when they could have easily prevented it, if it means they get to have clean hands and avoid some kind of misplaced guilt. They think for some reason that a vote equals a bomb, and that choosing to be a centrist means opting out of responsibility for their government’s actions. They think they can live all alone in their white middle class suburban bubble. That their inaction means they can’t have any of the blame laid at their feet. They pay taxes to the US government, which uses the taxes to buy bombs to kill Palestinians, and these centrists think that choosing not to take responsibility for how their tax dollars are spent makes them guiltless. And that taking on a guilty conscience by accepting responsibility, is a bigger price to pay than genocide and war.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              So let me get your position straight:

              The people voting egarly for the warcriminal government: not responsible for their governments actions

              The people so disgusted by their governments actions such that they vote 3rd party: completely responsible for their governments actions

              You’re Canadian right? Go yell at people to vote in your election

              • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yep, you got my position straight. See, the difference is whether they’re taking action to mitigate the impact of their taxes. If you do nothing, it’s your fault. If you try to make it right as best you can, it’s not your fault.

                Like I said, these non voters think votes turn into bombs and not dollars. They think every bomb dropped on Gaza has a little ballot slip in it with Joe Biden’s name on it. Us leftists know that votes for the best candidate do not make the problem worse.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  But voting for the second in command for the guy that was just bypassing congress to send weapons to the occupation doesn’t seem to be ‘taking action’ it seems to be rewarding people for participating in a slaughter (wringing your hands as you send ammunition still counts as sending ammunition)

                  You have just come up with a conclusion that makes you feel good personally and are vomiting word garbage to attempt to justify it to other people.